Sieht gut aus!

Hatten wir da nicht mal bei Airliners.net ein Bild von oben? Ich glaub da stand in den comments, dass die für Filmaufnahmen gebraucht wurde, oder erinnnere ich mich da falsch:confused:
 
James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première
By Justin Wastnage


The previously top-secret specially-modified former British Airways (BA) Boeing 747-200 that features in the forthcoming James Bond film Casino Royale has been shown to the public for the first time.
The aircraft, dubbed 747-XXX (which has had two fictional Hollywood registrations, N88892 and N9747P) has been used for filming since the beginning year of the Eon Productions / Sony Pictures Casino Royale, which features Daniel Craig as James Bond in his first mission as a "00" UK special agent. The filming has taken place at Dunsfold Park airfield outside London, which has also been transformed to replicate Miami airport at night for the movie.
The decommissioned 747-200 (formerly G-BDXJ) has been transformed with the two outer engines replaced with outboard wing tanks, while the inner engines have been replaced with mocked-up dual pylon-mounted engine pods under each wing near similar to those initially on the Boeing B-47 Stratojet.
 
fluhu hat gesagt.:
James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première
By Justin Wastnage


The previously top-secret specially-modified former British Airways (BA) Boeing 747-200 that features in the forthcoming James Bond film Casino Royale has been shown to the public for the first time.
The aircraft, dubbed 747-XXX (which has had two fictional Hollywood registrations, N88892 and N9747P) has been used for filming since the beginning year of the Eon Productions / Sony Pictures Casino Royale, which features Daniel Craig as James Bond in his first mission as a "00" UK special agent. The filming has taken place at Dunsfold Park airfield outside London, which has also been transformed to replicate Miami airport at night for the movie.
The decommissioned 747-200 (formerly G-BDXJ) has been transformed with the two outer engines replaced with outboard wing tanks, while the inner engines have been replaced with mocked-up dual pylon-mounted engine pods under each wing near similar to those initially on the Boeing B-47 Stratojet.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken....

Frage mich wirklich was dieser Aufwand bringen soll? :confused:
Reicht denn ein "normales" Flugzeug das in der Realität existiert denn nicht aus? Wahrscheinlich sieht man das Flugzeug im Film dann eine halbe Minute... scheinbar geht's der Branche gut genug, da kann man dann richtig klotzen. :whistle:
 
Finds auch blödsinn, den unterschied erkennt doch im film sowieso nur ein luftfahrt-interessierter......

Und für die ist der Umbau dann wenig begeisterungs-erregend....

Was ich mich frage: Hätte eine solche anordnung der Triebwerke z.B. bei einem A380 irgendeinen Vorteil?

Die äusseren Gondeln beanspruchen die Tragflächen aufgrund ihrer Hebelwirkung nicht unerheblich mehr als die inneren......

Daher die Frage: Könnte man nicht leichtere Tragflächen bauen, wenn man beim A380 beispielsweiese die Triebwerke so angeordnet hätte???
 
Um antworten zu können musst du eingeloggt sein.
Zurück
Oben